Identification of oneself with a particular group, clan, community, nationality, language, etc are unavoidable until one has reached a stage when one can live and think beyond these boundaries.
That indeed is a tall order and creates a lot of difficulties in ones socio-economic fronts.
So essentially, these are team building exercises to create communes with identities of mutual trust and benefit so that there is an easy route for various life transactions.
But, as long as these community building exercises remain as mere groupings for ones own survival or the economic success of the members of the group, they do not create much problem, except that others outside the group could feel envious about their success. But no law on earth can protect those who are not able to build strong teams themselves. Such methods are called cartelisation and work in the best interest of the group - most often a closed group. These are primarily with economic success in mind.
The old concepts of cast, community, etc have essential the cartel concepts embedded in them.
When religious groups found themselves under threat or in minority in certain places, they also have had to take upon this exercise for their betterment or survival.
However, whenever there is one cartel formed and found to be thriving or creating problem for the others, there is a tendency for another or more number of cartels to be formed to beat them at their own game.
This game takes place in a continuum. To find out the root cause, one has to answer whether the egg came first or the chick.
The grouping that is being attempted in India at present, particularly in the past decade with more intensity to create a Hindu identity is a reaction to the identity created in the name of Muslim and Christian religions, in this country.
The groups that have identified with the Muslim religion or the Christian religion may have their own reasons. But, the fact that their cartelisation has been creating a social stir is undisputed. Their tendency to give open declaration to their faith and cult, demanding the right to conversion, etc are basically against the accepted norms in this country where it is expected that one is left to be happy with his own faith and that is his or her personal affair. But to make it into a socio-economic cult has created divides in the society. This is accepted even in circles of non-believers or atheists. And there are some people within those denominations also who do not accept these loud mouthed approaches. But as usual they are not heard. And the present situation does not give much room for discussion on that too.
This polarization is being made use of by some other interests to create a counter polarization in the name of Hinduism.
But these people fail to understand that Hinduism as a concept is allergic to such an identification and is too unwieldy to be compressed into a cartel.
Any one feeling sympathy for a person with a Hindu identity, for his poverty or difficulties due to not being part of a cartel, has to essentially build mechanisms and structures to help him or give him solace. Simply calling upon them to group and form into a party or elect some one to power will not do. For that the primary thing to be done is to do away with cast discrimination. With the major dividing wall of caste, creed and wealth dispositions, there is no meaning in talking about a unity in the name of Hinduism.
The leaders who worked for the rejuvenation of the Hindu faith and who brought back dignity and self respect for those who belonged to that segment and helped the fight against alien rule, again and again stressed the need for this.
If Ambedkar and Periyar preferred the British rule to self rule, it was out of a profound understanding and fear that the change of guard would help only transfer of power into the hands of the powerful section within the Hindu community who were still feudal in mind set.
The leaders who really felt that the people of the country who did not have a system to fall back upon for their survival, engaged in building such institutions. The Ramakrishna order, Aurovile, the Sathya Sayee trust, etc were commissioned in that direction.
However, some later organisations which also professed such ideals, have become prey to the political climate and have started chanting the mantra of Hindutva as an omniscient panacea for all evils that the society is facing today.
In the process, they fail to understand that they are only giving room for more polarization on the other side, while without caste-based discrimination being abolished, their own intended polarization would not take place at all, in real terms.
This then is going to do more harm than good for their own folks.
At least the 'folks' should understand this, before it is too late.
That indeed is a tall order and creates a lot of difficulties in ones socio-economic fronts.
So essentially, these are team building exercises to create communes with identities of mutual trust and benefit so that there is an easy route for various life transactions.
But, as long as these community building exercises remain as mere groupings for ones own survival or the economic success of the members of the group, they do not create much problem, except that others outside the group could feel envious about their success. But no law on earth can protect those who are not able to build strong teams themselves. Such methods are called cartelisation and work in the best interest of the group - most often a closed group. These are primarily with economic success in mind.
The old concepts of cast, community, etc have essential the cartel concepts embedded in them.
When religious groups found themselves under threat or in minority in certain places, they also have had to take upon this exercise for their betterment or survival.
However, whenever there is one cartel formed and found to be thriving or creating problem for the others, there is a tendency for another or more number of cartels to be formed to beat them at their own game.
This game takes place in a continuum. To find out the root cause, one has to answer whether the egg came first or the chick.
The grouping that is being attempted in India at present, particularly in the past decade with more intensity to create a Hindu identity is a reaction to the identity created in the name of Muslim and Christian religions, in this country.
The groups that have identified with the Muslim religion or the Christian religion may have their own reasons. But, the fact that their cartelisation has been creating a social stir is undisputed. Their tendency to give open declaration to their faith and cult, demanding the right to conversion, etc are basically against the accepted norms in this country where it is expected that one is left to be happy with his own faith and that is his or her personal affair. But to make it into a socio-economic cult has created divides in the society. This is accepted even in circles of non-believers or atheists. And there are some people within those denominations also who do not accept these loud mouthed approaches. But as usual they are not heard. And the present situation does not give much room for discussion on that too.
This polarization is being made use of by some other interests to create a counter polarization in the name of Hinduism.
But these people fail to understand that Hinduism as a concept is allergic to such an identification and is too unwieldy to be compressed into a cartel.
Any one feeling sympathy for a person with a Hindu identity, for his poverty or difficulties due to not being part of a cartel, has to essentially build mechanisms and structures to help him or give him solace. Simply calling upon them to group and form into a party or elect some one to power will not do. For that the primary thing to be done is to do away with cast discrimination. With the major dividing wall of caste, creed and wealth dispositions, there is no meaning in talking about a unity in the name of Hinduism.
The leaders who worked for the rejuvenation of the Hindu faith and who brought back dignity and self respect for those who belonged to that segment and helped the fight against alien rule, again and again stressed the need for this.
If Ambedkar and Periyar preferred the British rule to self rule, it was out of a profound understanding and fear that the change of guard would help only transfer of power into the hands of the powerful section within the Hindu community who were still feudal in mind set.
The leaders who really felt that the people of the country who did not have a system to fall back upon for their survival, engaged in building such institutions. The Ramakrishna order, Aurovile, the Sathya Sayee trust, etc were commissioned in that direction.
However, some later organisations which also professed such ideals, have become prey to the political climate and have started chanting the mantra of Hindutva as an omniscient panacea for all evils that the society is facing today.
In the process, they fail to understand that they are only giving room for more polarization on the other side, while without caste-based discrimination being abolished, their own intended polarization would not take place at all, in real terms.
This then is going to do more harm than good for their own folks.
At least the 'folks' should understand this, before it is too late.