When I start this ‘Testimony of an Individual’, I am reminded about JK’s question, as to who really an individual is.Whether he is really indivisible, as the term would suggest? Are we not made up of various parts - whether by cell structure or by thought process? The cells keep on changing, recreating, dying, and the body is in a state of constant flux. The mind keeps changing. Thoughts flow in and out. From where, we are yet to gather. Controls, we think, we have. Biological process some would say. Chemical process, others would state. Consciousness, claims someone else. The certainty of the physical form is itself sometimes in question. Therefore, the question of as to who is an individual and who is this ‘I’ has remained fundamental to all philosophy, worldwide, for ages, from the Upanishads, to the Buddha, to Socrates, to JK and to Ramana Maharshi. Everyone, thinks on this at some point in time, though not always.
I
remember to have read a story, some time back, but could not exactly locate it
now or remember the author. It was
something like this:
In an
area where a lot of labourers or poor people lived, came to reside a call girl
in a palatial house. She was
unapproachable by any of the local people, but had rich customers from
outside. The poor locals were furious
over this and decided to get to her by a plan.
They decided to pool their money by contributing one penny each, so that
they will be able to gather as much as to become eligible to be entertained
by her and to select one person amongst them by lot, to be sent to her, as
their representative. Thus, one of them
goes there and after the purpose was served, reveals to her his identity. When she asks him how he managed to get the huge
amount in spite of coming from the poor locality, he reveals how they collected
the money. She then picks up one penny from the money he had given her and
gives it back to him saying, ‘you had it for free’.
This
short story has left a lasting impression on me.
We are
all, in some ways, that call girl; in many ways, that person who was sent to
her; and mostly those who sent him there by collecting and contributing.
All
these form part of the ‘I’.
And
much more….
இங்கு ஏகன் அனேகன் தத்துவம் தவறாக புரிய வைக்க படுவதால்.
ReplyDelete