Came across a news item circulated in Whatsapp as below:
"In the Indian state of Karnataka, a leopard was chasing a dog to eat it, but the dog ran and jumped into the toilet of a government rest house, whose door was locked from the outside. The leopard also entered the toilet but both got trapped. The dog saw the leopard and sat quietly in a corner, waiting for the leopard to attack. Both animals stayed in different corners for about 12 hours. Then, the forest department team used a tranquilizer dart to capture the leopard and release it. The question is, why didn't the hungry leopard eat the dog, even though it was chasing it to eat, and could have easily done so in the locked toilet?"
- I was reminded of another photo and news item where a Cheetah was kept in a cage near three other cages in which three dogs were also kept and when they were all released, when the dogs lunged forward, the cheetah had kept quiet. The message said that the cheetah was not ready to prove its speed, just for a race.
While the Cheetah might have
signaled ‘self respect’, the behavior of the leopard when it was trapped
along with a prey it was pursuing, is intriguing.
On one hand, the pose of the
dog, putting it’s head down, expecting to be attacked any moment by it’s
expected predator, is heart rending. On
the other hand, the pose of the leopard lying in the other corner, perhaps
expecting to be killed or trapped any moment is also hear rending.
The question as to why the leopard did not kill it’s prey, could be answered only by the probability that it knew about the trap and was fearing for it’s own life. The second possibility is it did not want to hunt a trapped prey?
Of course, had it been a man,
in the place of the leopard, perhaps, even at that moment, he would have
preferred to make best use of the opportunity and would have had a go at the
prey.
Animals after all are seen to
have some ground rules - DHARMA.